Search for: "DOES 1-101"
Results 381 - 400
of 3,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
Business Methods: Section 101 does not categorically exclude business methods from patentability. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 3:48 am
However, "if the TTAB does not consider the marketplace usage of the parties’ marks, the TTAB's decision should 'have no later preclusive effect in a suit where actual usage in the marketplace is the paramount issue.'" Id. at 156–57 (quoting McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 32:101). [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:26 am
The article includes 3 “Estate Planning 101 Inheritance Lessons” to help your family become better prepared for the inevitable: 1. practice honesty and transparency, 2. plan ahead and update often, and 3. think through your own wishes and the wishes of your heirs. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:04 am
The article includes 3 “Estate Planning 101 Inheritance Lessons” to help your family become better prepared for the inevitable: 1. practice honesty and transparency, 2. plan ahead and update often, and 3. think through your own wishes and the wishes of your heirs. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 7:28 am
The Copyright Act defines work made for hire at 17 USC §101. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:03 am
” The Federal Circuit considered claims 1-3: 1. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:51 am
We are not covering other important issues such as group health, disability, or life insurance, although they are also very important.1. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:45 pm
How does the business operate as a whole? [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:52 pm
Therefore, (1) automatic denial of statutory damages under HRS §101-27 in Condemnation 1 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of damages, (2) the court's conclusion that Condemnation 2 was not abated by Condemnation 2 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of whether the public purpose asserted in Condemnation 2 was pretextual.Slip op. at 5. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:32 pm
Therefore, (1) automatic denial of statutory damages under HRS §101-27 in Condemnation 1 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of damages, (2) the court's conclusion that Condemnation 2 was not abated by Condemnation 2 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of whether the public purpose asserted in Condemnation 2 was pretextual.Slip op. at 5. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:47 am
” Apple Br. at 1. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 8:16 pm
Doe ex rel Doe 611 F.3d 888, 54 IDELR 275 (DC Cir 7/6/10) DC Circuit ruled that HO did not exceed his authority where he reduced a disciplinary suspension. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:47 am
Of special interest to many U.S. employers is that the automatic extension provision applies to employees who have filed adjustment of status applications based on an offer of employment by a U.S. employer, but does not apply to foreign nationals who are employed pursuant to F-1 EADs or to spouses of foreign nationals in H-1B, L-1, E-1/E-2 or E-3 nonimmigrant status. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:29 am
In this regard, the word mark ‘EZMIX’ does not provide any direct information on how the goods and services concerned would be used. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:16 pm
H.B. 29 amends Utah Code sections 73-4-1, -3, -4, -5, -9, -11, and -22. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:31 am
Let's take a look at what most people assume is the law and see if we can get there: does the Patent Act allow a court to invalidate a patent that does not claim patentable subject matter? [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
Will Baude points out that the petition's indecipherable nature may be due to inadequate supervision by the attorney on the case.Both Blackman and Baude highlight the petition's mysterious question presented:“Does the US Constitution, in legal decisions based on 35 USC §§ 101/102/103/112, • require instantly avoiding the inevitable legal errors in construing incomplete and vague classical claim constructions – especially for… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:07 pm
(c)(1) Domestic assault is punishable the same as assault in § 39-13-101. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:06 am
Bilski claim 1: 1. [read post]
