Search for: "David Clinton v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Only Bill Clinton-appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Bush I-appointed David Souter. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:35 pm
David, an Indiana judge in civilian life, has said he wants to meet American Bar Association standards in the cases -- meaning assigning 12 government lawyers, six investigators and six paralegals. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:32 am
In a freakish turn, new NY Governor David Paterson and his wife held a press conference yesterday in which he admitted to having several extramarital affairs, including one with a state employee he supervised. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 10:40 am
By Big Tent Democrat Here is the transcript of the Carville (a Clinton supporter) v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 4:05 pm
In his blog, Washington Post reporter David Achenbach suggests that if the delegate count is close enough, the Clinton campaign will start agitating for the seating of the Michigan and Florida delegates in what can only be described as Bush v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
The New York Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for individuals with cerebral palsy within the State of New York. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
He's posted a PDF of Jones v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:29 pm
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Some highly experienced law of war experts inside the military would eventually conclude (following the "gap" argument about GC3 and GC4) that they should be treated instead as spies and saboteurs under GC4, but no one so far as I know suggested that they would be POWs, and the White House lawyers did not have the background knowledge really to understand that (the role of David Addington in this debate is unknown to me, but I do wonder). [read post]