Search for: "David v. District of Columbia" Results 381 - 400 of 800
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm by Rory Little
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Chris Castle
[We’re pleased to have another outstanding guest post by Stephen Carlisle, an entertainment lawyer with over 25 years experience in private practice in the State of Florida. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:59 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected challenges to the Federal Communications Commission’s so-called “net neutrality” rules. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am by David Kopel
Yolo, which had been brought by Alan Gura, the winning lawyer in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am by INFORRM
District Judge Tan Ikram will give a written judgement on the case on 2 June 2016. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm by David Kopel
 Inter alia, he created the “narrow individual right” theory of the Second Amendment, which was later popularized by historian Saul Cornell and earned four votes in the Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
Samuel David Simmons, a forensic pathologist employed by the North Carolina Office of the Chief Medical Examiner at the time Eugene Cameron's body was autopsied. [read post]
3 May 2016, 8:17 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit nullified Amtrak’s shared role in settling disputes over those rules. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:19 am by Jennifer Davis
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [Parhat v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 6:04 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:19 pm by David Kopel
Indeed, the Supreme Court rejected essentially the same argument in Heller—that the District of Columbia’s handgun ban did not unconstitutionally burden the right to self-defense because the law permitted the possession of long guns for home defense. [read post]