Search for: "Davis v. Strong"
Results 381 - 400
of 665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
INS v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
Of course, the Court’s decision in Romer v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Davis, 537 A.2d 1100, 1119 (D.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm
This is evident, for instance, in the fact that all the Supreme Court's sexual harassment cases have been nonpseudonymous (except Davis as next friend of LaShonda D. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
I chose this opinion over other strong candidates, such as the majority opinion in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
However, at the time Davis was decided, the Court had earlier determined in Griggs v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Clark Martin, who retired from Vinson & Elkins on Jan. 1, says among those planning to join Kelly Hart as Houston partners are two V&E partners who are close to that firm's mandatory retirement age of 67, and former Enron Corp. general counsel James V. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:57 am
Kovich v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
Davis, which involves the standards for government-funded investigations to establish an indigent defendant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and Wilson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:07 pm
Clark v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 2:49 am
Among the significant opinions he authored was United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
This past summer, in Gundy v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am
” Roberts v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am
Fensterer, supra; Davis v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:43 am
The panel does an excellent job reviewing the appropriate law, especially the “primary purpose” test articulated in Davis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
" Flynt v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:48 am
Davis is is extremely straightforward. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Here’s the opening of Justice O’Connor’s separate opinion in Davis v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
