Search for: "Davis v. Strong"
Results 381 - 400
of 665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 11:47 am
Of interest to statutory interpretation types (and along the lines of what I've been arguing in previous posts), Judge Davis also argued that this isn't a case of "textualism v. purposivism" or statutory text versus some amorphous concept of congressional intent. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
The case for crediting the narrow understandings reflected in concurring opinions in this setting is especially strong when the majority opinion may itself be fuzzy (or silent) on the legal question at issue. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Davis that people have an expectation of privacy in “even one point of cell site location data. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
The evidence against Davis was pretty strong. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:17 pm
Davis, 454 U.S. 370, 375 (1982). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
The bill passed under a suspension of the rules and had strong bipartisan support from members. . . [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Abaclat v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:31 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
For example, in Syvrud v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
” ANR Coal Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
” ANR Coal Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 am
There are strong parallels to the press. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:17 pm
See Markman v. [read post]
