Search for: "Davis v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 381 - 400
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 8:22 pm
Circuit extended the Court's previous holding on False Claims Act damages announced last year in the case of United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
Gottlieb notified Agent Azad and Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Knox that he was representing defendant and asked that his client not be interviewed unless he was present. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
United States and its progeny. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
Justice Swatanter KumarSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Raheja Universal Limited Vs. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
mod=googlenews_wsj, on United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
” It’s a fitting description for solitary confinement at Varner Super Maximum Security Unit in the Arkansas Department of Correction. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
As an employee of the Information Technology Department at the United States Attorney's Office for over ten years, Reynolds w [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
Dukes, the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit will hear oral arguments on Friday in Davis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
Department of Justice, for Plaintiff. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
Davis Law Review. 26 (1993) : 791-851. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Davis (11-714), on redistricting the state senate, and Perry v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
United States Dist. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
Now, the Justices are at least considering that very suggestion. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:54 am
See Handschu v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm
The Government v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions in their skeleton… [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
As established in United States v. [read post]
