Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 381 - 400 of 8,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2010, 3:22 am by Toni Guarino
  For further information contact Barroway Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Check, LLP (Ramzi Abadou, Esq. or Erik Peterson, Esq.) toll free at 1-888-299-7706 or 1-415-400-3005, or via e-mail at info@btkmc.com. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:45 pm
Do they a) raise defenders' salaries nonetheless; b) keep defenders' salaries where they are; or c) lower defenders' salaries by $11,999, figuring that defenders were paid enough before and should be happy with a net $1 raise? [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:37 am by Jon Sands
Collazo, No. 15-50509 (12-2-20)(en banc). [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:35 am by Jon Sands
Kelley, No. 19-30066 (6-15-20)(Ikuta w/R. [read post]
27 May 2020, 12:42 pm by Jon Sands
Ray, No. 18-50115 and Bacon, No. 18-50120 (4-28-20)(Per Curiam; concurrence by Wardlaw). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
Unidentified Parties - Does 1-20The Accused Infringers last sought dismissal of the 20 parties identified only as Does 1-20. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
Unidentified Parties - Does 1-20The Accused Infringers last sought dismissal of the 20 parties identified only as Does 1-20. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 11:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It does  not.Under Title VII, the 15-employee minimum applies to private and public defendants. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:25 am
In June, McMahon had awarded a summary judgment to the Governor and dismissed a complaint brought by three Westchester County apartment-building owners (1:20-cv-04062). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Claimant does not allege that defendant's age limitation hiring plan is a subterfuge to evade the purposes of the ADEA; rather, claimant contends that the exception does not apply here, where claimant worked as a part-time officer and attempted to transfer into full-time employment. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" Claimant does not allege that defendant's age limitation hiring plan is a subterfuge to evade the purposes of the ADEA; rather, claimant contends that the exception does not apply here, where claimant worked as a part-time officer and attempted to transfer into full-time employment. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:33 am by Eugene Volokh
The definition of sexual relations in SCR 20:1.8(k)(1) connotes conduct directly between the lawyer and the client. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:46 pm by Howard Friedman
” Without more facts, this allegation is conclusory and does not plead enough facts to place it in any of the exceptions listed above. [read post]