Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 381 - 400
of 8,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] For a timely summary, see Jill E. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
The defendant opposed the motions, claiming the failure to disclose was merely an oversight. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
And while the business judgment rule should protect decisions of this nature from undue interference by the courts, in the “20/20 hindsight” world of stockholder litigation, it never hurts to spell out what is otherwise an inference. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
No. 20. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
The LSE Media Blog has an article on the role of disinformation in political campaigning and its impact on voters, arguing it does not have the sway on elections that is often assumed. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
The two most common ‘reduction instances’ are (1) filing the Response to an office action after the office action’s first deadline, and (2) filing an incomplete response where the response does not address all the issues alleged in the office action. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
A partnership comprising partners who are citizens of 30 states would be able to invoke diversity jurisdiction only against opponents from the other 20 states. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
(And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
But lawyers are already speculating that the award may exceed $1 billion. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
” The court additionally noted that, under F.R.C.P. 4(h)(1)(A), a corporation may be served “in the manner prescribed by Rule 4(e)(1) for serving an individual. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
§ 1, cl. 1, likewise vests the executive Power in “the President of the United States of America. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
does trading on goodwill mean materiality? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm
Congress is allowed to say (as it often does) that something can be excluded from gross income or deducted when computing taxable income, but that does not mean that the exclusion or deduction was not income in the first place. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Moab Partners LP,[1] a closely followed case that ought to address whether a purported failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
In the wave of litigation that followed, bump stock owners challenged the ATF’s interpretation and argued that, given the statutes’ criminal implications, the rule of lenity required that any ambiguity in the NFA and GCA should be resolved in the defendant’s favor. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:53 am
Vehicle D if there were enough coverage, could recover 80% of its damages (100% – 20% fault), so $40,000.Considering the Policy Limits:Vehicle A’s insurance has a limit of $60,000. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:53 am
Vehicle D if there were enough coverage, could recover 80% of its damages (100% – 20% fault), so $40,000.Considering the Policy Limits:Vehicle A’s insurance has a limit of $60,000. [read post]
