Search for: "Doe PL"
Results 381 - 400
of 931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2015, 3:38 pm
While intent to use the firearm unlawfully is an element of NY PL 265.03(1), it is not an element or requirement under NY PL 265,03(3). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:56 am
"Dangerous Instrument" Does Not Have to be a Switchblade, Firearm, Shotgun, Razor, or Other "Obvious" Weapon People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:51 am
(Pls.' Mem. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:21 am
Murray, you are guilty of PL 120.15 if, by physical menace, you intentionally place or attempt to place another person in fear of death, imminent serious physical injury or physical. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 2:23 pm
One of the most important concerns for the accused and his or her criminal defense attorney is whether to plead guilty to a particular charge or a reduced offense being offered by a prosecutor, Specifically, what effect does such a plea have on the defendant’s future employment, licensure or certification. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
"The penalty imposed does not shock the conscience" when "the petitioner knowingly permitted the possession and sale of drugs on the premises." [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The end consumer does not, making it a tax on final consumption. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 10:08 am
However, merely because there is no specific statute addressing cell phones, mobile phones, smart phones and other personal devices such as iPads does not mean there is no crime or crimes that occur when one is stolen. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 10:08 am
However, merely because there is no specific statute addressing cell phones, mobile phones, smart phones and other personal devices such as iPads does not mean there is no crime or crimes that occur when one is stolen. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:24 am
And when he does, just give him the old lateral move pitch: you’re looking for great work, more money high-profile clients, more money and a firm with a stellar reputation more money. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:59 am
History has taught us that this does not usually work. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:19 pm
Thus, the legislative history of the statute clearly does not support such an application of this law to this conduct. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:19 pm
Thus, the legislative history of the statute clearly does not support such an application of this law to this conduct. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
According to this Board, the interpretation of those decisions ignores the fact that Article 114(2) EPC does not justify such discretion, as previous case law has repeatedly stated. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 5:03 am
(Pls.'s Opp'n at 3.) [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
Penn Law (PL): Please tell us a little bit about the book and your reasons for writing it. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:03 pm
Have you ever heard of B>PL? [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:59 am
Questions about particular documents, such as “Does the Jones v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:02 am
Defs.' Opp'n to Pls.' Mot. at 35. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:29 pm
The plaintiffs' brief does not say that Tenenbaum caused billions of dollars in damages. [read post]
