Search for: "Doe v. Reed" Results 381 - 400 of 1,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2008, 12:30 pm
" And my upstate colleague Jim Reed at ZiffLaw described a fundamental problem with that law, via an email exchange with a prospective client: If you are lazy and "milk" the injury, you qualify to bring suit under New York's statute, but if you struggle back to work, and work despite the pain and limitations you might have, you don't qualify. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
Lord Phillips gave the lead judgment, with which Lord Mance, Lord Reed, Lord Clarke, Lord Brown and the Lord Chief Justice (Lord Judge), agreed. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson on 12 April 2016. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Accordingly, their claims for compensation for injury to feelings could not succeed. [54] Judgment Judgment for the Supreme Court was given by Lord Toulson, with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Reed and Hughes agreed. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:04 am by Larry Joseph - Guest
While the federal government is preeminent in foreign policy, federal immigration law does not endeavor to set foreign policy, which renders inapposite the foreign-policy preemption cases such as Crosby v. [read post]