Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan" Results 381 - 400 of 1,709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2020, 9:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
One is allowed to proceed with her case, but the other case is dismissed for good.The case is Creese v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 19 May 2020, Soole J heard an appeal from Deputy Master Sullivan in the case of France v Khan. [read post]
Our conclusion is clear: Judge Sullivan does not merely have the authority to review the Department’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
First, Paradis does not note the massive changes to the convening authority’s posttrial review power now encoded in Article 60a of the UCMJ. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:16 am by Peter Mahler
Among other precedents, Chertok relied on the First Department’s 2012 opinion in Sullivan v Harnisch in which the court held that a sole-discretion provision in the operating agreement of an investment fund “clearly and unambiguously provided that [the manager] had the sole discretion to determine plaintiff’s ‘Sharing Ratio,’ which would be used to determine his allocation of the bonus pool comprised of 75% of the funds’ profits. [read post]