Search for: "Does I & II"
Results 381 - 400
of 23,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2013, 12:58 pm
But that does not seem to be the case. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 3:12 am
Section 503(c)(2)(F)(i) of the 1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 2463(c)(2)(F)(i)) provides that the President may disregard the competitive need limitation provided in section 503(c)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the 1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 2463(c)(2)(A)(i)(II)) with respect to any eligible article from any beneficiary developing country, if the aggregate appraised value of the imports of such article into the United States during the preceding calendar year does not… [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:15 pm
For PIPEDA enforcement, I’m not suggesting the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (“OPC”) not do what it does but a legitimate question does exist as whether it should be the only route to follow for those with privacy complaints. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:35 am
The Washington Post reports that despite the recent court ruling (pdf) that the FCC does not have the authority to force broadband service providers to treat all Internet traffic equally, the Commission may continue to regulate broadband services based on “Title I ancillary authority,” rather than define it as a “common carrier” service under the more legally stable TItle II: [I]n recent discussions . . . [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
In response to my top five reasons why the Supreme Court granted full review in Tobacco instead of Pfizer, a reader writes: I think your reasons 2 3 4 and 5 as to why Tobacco II is the lead are all sound and plausible. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:14 pm
Although IRRC disapproval does not permanently bar a regulation, it does delay its implementation. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:44 am
The post Seventh Circuit: Title VII Does Not Cover Sexual Orientation Bias appeared first on Health Employment And Labor. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:59 am
If it does, ask yourself whether you are comfortable crossing one or more state lines to litigate an action. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm
I look forward to reading more of Price's valuable work on the interface between IP and regulatory regimes. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:00 pm
The DOL will (i) consider alternate document production based on costs and administrative burdens and (ii) extend response dates. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm
Part II: click here [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:21 am
Last night I attended the Coral Gables Commission Candidates’ Forum for Group II, organized by organized by the Ponce Business Association. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:23 pm
Jane Doe II (In the Interest of Jane Doe I), 2008 Ida. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
Although a company or European DPA obviously lacks the ability to block surveillance by a foreign authority, it does possess the power to prohibit or suspend a particular international data transfer if it concludes that the standards of EU law are not met. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:07 am
For a variety of structural reasons, my program does not, with one exception. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am
I should begin by acknowledging that this is an editorial, not news. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:25 am
That is the existence of Article 6 of Additional Protocol II, the AP II analog to Article 75(4) of AP I. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:20 am
Last summer I was on a panel at a conference addressing this issue, and the question was asked does the FAPE requirement trump the LRE requirement? [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm
In last week’s post titled Does an Insured Have to Wait to Pursue Bad Faith? [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 11:31 am
Does Oyez.org have plans to introduce any new features in the near future? [read post]
