Search for: "Downloader 43" Results 381 - 400 of 777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The board considers that there may be circumstances where evidence from the lecturer and only one member of the audience is convincing enough to reach the standard of proof - i.e. beyond reasonable doubt.Oral testimony of Dr Wallukat and Dr Kunze[43] The board felt that its reservations concerning declarations E1 and E2 and document E3 could possibly be dispelled by hearing the authors of declarations E1 and E2 themselves. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 1:30 pm by Eric Goldman
You can now enjoy the video (download or stream (item #43)). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  It is just one study with only 43 subjects, but it does make you think. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:45 am by Susan Brenner
The evidence in question was four articles downloaded on the phone from the internet within about ten hours of the shootings. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 10:27 am by Jonathan Bailey
This week’s stories include: Fox Fails Again in Bid to Stop Dish’s Hopper Judge Leans in Favor of Aereo in Boston Lawsuit Google Book Search Case May Be Wrapping Up Warner Brothers May Be Held Accountable for False DMCA Notices Spain Passes New Anti-Piracy Legislation “Escape From Tomorrow” Escapes Legal Action Center for Copyright Information and Others Propose Copyright Curriculum for Elementary Schools You can download the MP3 file here (1:17:43, direct… [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Moreover, it was held that claims 6 to 8, the features of which are now present in claims 1, 5 and 6, did not fulfil the requirements of R 43.However, the impugned decision is not based on grounds of which objections of non-compliance with A 84 and R 43 form part.[9] As already found in decision T 1640/06, objections that do not form part of the grounds for a refusal of an application, in particular objections in obiter dicta, can be meant as voluntary information to an applicant… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 9:32 pm by Silki Patel
  According to Business Insider, the “top 10 mobile health applications generate up to 4 million free and 300,000 daily downloads. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 11:34 am by Jonathan Bailey
According to the judgment, Hotfile lost its safe harbor protection due to the fact it had an inadequate repeat infringer policy, having only terminated accounts of 43 infringers after over 10 million DMCA notices. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
Hotfile also provided premium service, which gave users additional file space and faster download speeds for a monthly fee. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Among other things, this means that a disclaimer is not allowable if the necessary limitation can be expressed in simpler terms in positive, originally disclosed features in accordance with R 43(1), first sentence (see G 1/03 [3, penultimate paragraph]). [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Susannah Tredwell
Debbie Schachter, “Metrics and Value” Information Outlook, 16(5): 42-43 (2012). [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:07 pm by Jon Gelman
A preliminary total of 4,383 fatal work injuries were recorded in the United States in 2012, down from a revised count of 4,693 fatal work injuries in 2011, according to results from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) conducted by the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by NBlack
And, not surprisingly, since solo attorneys use mobile devices the most, they also download the most apps, with 43 percent reporting that they downloaded apps in 2013, up from 30 percent in 2012. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In principle, this means that the method of determination and the measurement conditions that could have an influence of the value of the parameter have to be indicated in the claim, either explicitly or, where absolutely necessary, by means of references to the description pursuant to R 43(6). [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:53 am by Susan Brenner
  And neither argued that “emails downloaded and stored on a personal computer are not included in the” definition of electronic storage. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
My article, "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" has just been published and will appear in Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013). [read post]