Search for: "Downs v. Powell"
Results 381 - 400
of 536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 3:44 pm
GWEN IFILL: Does Bush v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 7:00 pm
(This was back when the idea that a court might totally blow a ruling was novel enough to be worth writing down). [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:32 pm
" Ford v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:06 pm
The victims' bodies were found face down in a circle, each shot in the head. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:19 pm
" "Not so here," Kozinski wrote in Doody v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in prohibiting the mother from telling the child that any man other than the father is the child's biological father (citing Matter of Powell v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:15 am
The four Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:00 pm
Grant Shapps has given A statement to Inside Housing on his view of the impact of Pinnock v Manchester and Powell v Hounslow on the plans for flexible tenancies. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:00 pm
Grant Shapps has given A statement to Inside Housing on his view of the impact of Pinnock v Manchester and Powell v Hounslow on the plans for flexible tenancies. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Boggerty v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (23 February 2011) This judgment gives guidance as to when eviction from local authority housing amounts to a breach of a tenant’s human rights and confirms that courts should have the power to consider the proportionality of previously automatic possession orders relating to council properties. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
Sukur Ali v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
This morning the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Powell in which the ways of dealing with these tensions and conundrums in the UK have been clarified. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
Latham v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
The ultimately controlling opinions were those issued jointly by three justices: Stewart, Powell, and, of course, Stevens. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm
(The Equal Rights Amendment was passed by both houses of Congress in 1972, and Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:43 am
Powell based, in part, on ties between the two that amounted to "judicial impropriety. [read post]
