Search for: "EASTERN EXPRESS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 381 - 400
of 513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
In its opinion, the Eastern District of Michigan noted that “[i]f that were the inevitable result, the arbitration agreement likely would violate public policy and would be unenforceable. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:14 pm
Nevertheless, I believe America isn't a monolith, and different opinions must be expressed. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Said and United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm
Supreme Court recently invited the Solicitor General to express the views of the United States on the topic (see our previous post here). [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Smyth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court in an 8-1 decision issued on June 30, 2020, in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:42 am
 It did not, therefore, refer to the ECJ's observation in para. 28 of its judgment in Owusu v Jackson (Case C-281/02) that: [T]he rules of the Brussels Convention on exclusive jurisdiction or express prorogation of jurisdiction are also likely to be applicable to legal relationships involving only one Contracting State and one or more non-Contracting States. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
The Specifics of the Original Case The underlying case, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
The Virginia Non-Compete Blog, whose focus is on the protection of employees, details a recent decision, United Marketing Solutions v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:32 am
Tam filed an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to register “The Slants” as a federal trademark. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:49 am
Mendez of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California upheld a California Bankruptcy Court order permitting the City of Vallejo, California to reject a collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
In contrast to the Tree Top Court’s unwillingness to infer an implied demand, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, in Scottsdale Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:31 pm
Contraceptives: Finally, the District Court in Eastern Michigan enjoined application of the HHS contraceptives rule to several individuals in Legatus, Weingartz, and Weingartz Supply Co. v. [read post]
