Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 3,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
This chapter explores this general development through detailed consideration of the particular case of Pierce v State (1843) 13 NH 536. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He stated that the question to be answered was whether CPA Order 17, which was no doubt procedurally binding in Iraq, operated as an impediment rendering it impossible for the plaintiff to claim his right, under art 435, where the English courts were concerned. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
  The principle, known as stare decisis, is fundamental to the common law system we adopted from England. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:01 am by Amy Howe
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the cellphone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am by INFORRM
   In England and any other common law jurisdiction (outside the United States), the damages would, at most have been in the low tens of thousands of pounds. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (“IPEC”), which superseded the Patents County Court for England and Wales in 2013, is acclimatising nicely to its new name, though it has been a few months since the first decision to come from the IPEC (Bocacina Ltd v Boca Cafes Ltd [2013] EWHC 3090 (IPEC)) reached the database of the British and Irish Legal Information Institute BAILII: this decision was reported on by Darren Smyth on the IPKat back in… [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
However, the Apple v Samsung cases pending before several national courts in Europe expose the inherent limitations of such provisions. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:25 am by Florian Mueller
It was originally scheduled for November 8.This week the United States Department of Justice and the European Commission cleared the Microsoft-Nokia deal, and the England and Wales High Court entered a UK injunction against various HTC devices including the One mini. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
   The OPQ case provides one possible “way out” of this unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am by Lucy Cass, Olswang LLP
   This is defined by the Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Eligibility) (England) Regulations 2006 which states that a person from abroad will be eligible for housing assistance if he is a “qualified person” pursuant to the EEA Regulations. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Karl Bayer
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Judgment Warby J considered that Mr Mitchell was domiciled or at least present in England and Wales, and therefore that the English Court had jurisdiction. [read post]