Search for: "Elliot v. Elliot"
Results 381 - 400
of 449
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:50 am
On June 11, 2009, the California Supreme Court declined to review Taylor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:50 am
On June 11, 2009, the California Supreme Court declined to review Taylor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:50 am
On June 11, 2009, the California Supreme Court declined to review Taylor v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 11:42 am
Elliot v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 12:20 am
In 2008, Fadallah terminated Marszalek as wrestling coach.The complaint (full text) in Marszalek v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 5:26 pm
In Cuomo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:01 am
Prisock-Elliot, decided on June 2, 2009. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Moreover, where "evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the court must determine whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one" (Steve Elliot, LLC v Teplitsky, 59 AD3d 523, 524, citing Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275). [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:50 pm
Citizen Media Law Project on Barnes v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:40 am
Carenbauer v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:21 am
Elliot, 2009 U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
Louis v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 6:21 am
In Young, Elliot Young appealed from his... [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:03 am
Benjamin Wolf (The Elliot Schlissel New York Law Blog) has a guest-post from the petitioner in Maloney v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 2:34 am
Long before the Ruiz v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
The case is Steve Elliot, LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
The case is Steve Elliot, LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:05 am
The Legal Intelligencer (2/11, Elliot-Engel) reports, "A month before a pharmaceutical class action was set for trial, a Philadelphia judge decertified the class of users of an epilepsy and neuralgia drug seeking reimbursement from the drug's maker after being prescribed the drug for uses not approved by federal regulators" granting "a pharmaceutical company defendant's motion for class decertification in Clark v. [read post]
