Search for: "Ely v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
The leading case in the UK post pregabalin is Eli Lilly v Genentech [2019] EWHC 387, where Arnold J also found that the plausibility threshold was not met.The key take home message is that plausibility is alive and well in the UK. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:52 pm
Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:16 am
McGinnis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:17 am
McGinnis v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
Amgen v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm
Normal pharma contract: Eli Lilly v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
The panel members were Mattias Zigann, the presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court, Philip Kerr of Allens Linklaters and Larry Welch, the Senior Director, and Assistant General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly and Company.Mr Ludwig explained that the question of what relief was appropriate had been highlighted by the very recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in AMGEN INC & ors v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:09 am
In Elie v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:01 am
Given Genentech's history of actively litigating this family of patents (see, e.g., MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:38 am
In a new essay for a symposium on abortion rights being hosted by the Journal of American Constitutional History, I argue that Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am
Over at Balkinization, an interesting conversation is unfolding on the uses of history in Supreme Court decisionmaking, especially as pertains to the recent Haaland v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
For one thing, Louisiana is the nation’s only civil law state. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
By: Elie A. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 – 20 July 2011. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:06 pm
However, in two spots, where The Professor was clearly stating his own personal opinion, we noted that. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
By its own terms, Georgia’s stalking statute “shall not apply to persons engaged in activities protected by the Constitution of the United States or of this state. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:57 am
Then, just like the HIPO, the court looked at the CJEU’s Eli Lilly judgment decision and stated that from that it is clear that in order to be eligible for an SPC for the combination there is no requirement for rosuvastatin to be mentioned structurally in the claim provided that the claim – interpreted in light of the description as provided in Art 69 EPC and the corresponding Hungarian rule – relates implicitly but necessarily and specifically to it. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 5:10 am
Uruguay [commented by Simon Klopschinski for The IPKat here], Eli Lilly v. [read post]
