Search for: "Eric Posner" Results 381 - 400 of 1,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Tuesday, January 26, 2016  |  Susana Medeiros According to University of Chicago Law Professor Eric Posner, the concept of maintaining a “balance of power” across the branches of government — a model of divided power that ensures that no branch is powerful enough to dominate another — should be abandoned. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Here's another short version of the Sunday Book Roundup:Richard Posner has an excerpt in Salon from his book Divergent Paths: The Academy and the Judiciary (Harvard University Press).New Books in History interviews Eric Foner, who discusses his latest, Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad (Norton). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz interviews Kirsten Powers on her new book The Silencing (wobbly audio in early minutes, which eventually clears); “Ex-tenant barred from saying that ex-landlord had been in the Witness Protection Program, ‘[r]egardless of the truth or falsity of this information'” [Volokh] Lawprof Eric Posner wants to roll back First Amendment to curb ISIS recruitment. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Scott Greenfield] Human Rights Campaign huffs and puffs about (perfectly legal) religious-college Title IX exemptions [Washington Post, HRC] Canadian judge: B.C. provincial law society wrongly barred accreditation for conservative Christian law school [Globe and Mail, earlier] Just out: “Free Speech on College Campuses” issue of Cato Unbound leads with Greg Lukianoff (“Campus Free Speech Has Been in Trouble for a Long Time”), with responses to follow from Eric… [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 12:09 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Lee Epstein es profesor en la Universidad de Washington y Eric Posner en la Universidad de Chicago. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 11:58 am by Ken White
Eric Posner: Long-time dedicated foe of the First Amendment continued his unprincipled assault on it. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:59 am
Eric Posner on the deaccessioning debate.Not really -- he's talking about something completely different. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:46 am by David Post
University of Chicago law professor Eric Posner — an occasional guest blogger here on the VC — has now joined their ranks as well, with a more thoughtful (and therefore even more distressing) argument for greater speech curbs (over at Slate.com: “ISIS Gives Us No Choice but to Consider Limits on Speech“). [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:25 am by Tom Smith
Wouldn’t he need to ask Congress to pass a new statute that authorized him to block Muslims? [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:38 am by SHG
Eric Posner writes a scholarly post explaining that the determination of who is allowed to enter our borders is controlled by legal precedent that provides, essentially, for a limitation that would be totally unconstitutional if applied to any other situation. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
Professor Eric Posner points out: The Supreme Court has held consistently, for more than a century, that constitutional protections that normally benefit Americans and people on American territory do not apply when Congress decides who to admit and who to exclude as immigrants or other entrants. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 11:05 am by Paul Caron
Jonathan Masur (Chicago) & Eric Posner (Chicago), Toward a Pigovian State, 164 U. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:46 am
" "Probably not," concludes Eric Posner in this blog post today. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 5:20 am by Howard Wasserman
I have no interest in wading into the morass over Judge Posner and Eric Segall's NYT op-ed suggesting that Justice Scalia believes that majoritarian religious preferences can trump minority rights--here is Corey Yung's effort, which began on Twitter. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:26 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Richard Posner and Eric Segall discuss recent remarks by Justice Antonin Scalia and conclude that the “logic of his position is that the Supreme Court should get out of the business of enforcing the Constitution altogether, for enforcing it overrides legislation, which is the product of elected officials, and hence of democracy. [read post]