Search for: "Ewing v. Ewing" Results 381 - 400 of 462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2010, 6:30 am by Jay Willis
  The editorial agrees with the Justice’s criticism, but it also notes that Justice Kennedy was also part of a five-four majority that rejected a challenge to the law’s lengthy sentences (in Ewing v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 2:49 am by Bystander
Plymouth City Council's patience and attempts to avoid that result can only be commended"http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/3562 gives the full judgment. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:02 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) BW Gas AS v JAS Shipping Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 68 (11 February 2010) Kulkarni v Manor Credit (Davenham) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 69 (11 February 2010) Humphreys v Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 56 (11 February 2010) Ewing v Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 70 (11 February 2010) Barber v London Borough of Croydon [2010] EWCA Civ 51 (11 February 2010) West Sussex County Council v… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am by Beck, et al.
Ewing, 282 A.2d 206, 222-23 (Pa. 1971) (subsequent drug label change a subsequent remedial measures; admitted under exception to rule); Matsko v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In support of his motion, plaintiff established that he was injured by a fall from an elevated work site and that the absence of appropriate safety devices was a proximate cause of his injuries (see Ewing v ADF Constr. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of EW) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2009] EWHC 2957 (Admin) 18 November 2009 Summary and comment by Rosalind English Article 3 does not dictate a minimum standard of social support for those in need, nor does it require the state to provide a home or minimum level of financial assistance to all within its care. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:29 am
 The Court affirmed California's three-strikes law in Ewing v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
Scrowther v Watermill Properties [2009] EW Misc 6 (EWCC) Newcastle upon Tyne County Court Continuing the Norwegian theme we appear to have adopted for such cases, here we have a example of an ex-sale and rent back agreement, void and gone to join the choir eternal. [read post]
IN A DIFFERENT VOICEJustice O'Neill's recent announcement that she will not seek re-election in 2010 adds something of a parting-shot quality to her vigorous dissent to the Court's disrespect for precedent and for trial courts' traditional discretion in deciding whether or not to grant a new trial in the interest of justice. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Edgartown, MA; Steven Ewing, President) Aquamarine Dredge, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
 Gathers concluded as follows:  "Since Fields, we have confirmed that '[n]ew legal principles, even when applied retroactively, do not apply to cases already closed.' Davis v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:08 am
A couple years ago in this space, I wrote about the now-defunct historical practice of haling non-human animals into court for offenses as varied as destroying crops, attacking humans, and even (ew) adultery. [read post]