Search for: "Ex parte Johnson"
Results 381 - 400
of 641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
And the exclusionary rule for changing law on direct appeal provides the critical incentive ex ante: The exclusionary rule gives criminal defendants an incentive to ask for changes in the law because it creates a possibility they might benefit from those changes. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
In Part I, I revisit the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Steel v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:01 pm
Johnson, 755 N.W.2d 758, 761 (Minn. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Yet the order (narrowed on appeal to 50 feet, but still unconstitutional) seems to have been based on pretty normal -- if acrimonious -- local political debate. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Drops John Bolton Book Lawsuit, Won’t Charge the Ex-Security Aide Who Became Trump’s Scathing Critic MSN – Spencer Hsu and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 6/16/2021 The Justice Department abandoned its effort to claw back profits of a book by former Trump national security adviser John Bolton and closed a grand jury investigation into whether he criminally mishandled classified information without charging him. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Alvarez says he was working as part of a contract to do community engagement, not lobbying, and therefore is not in violation of ethics law. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
Westly, No. 07-16902, 07-17223 In long-running litigation involving the constitutionality of California's statutory procedure addressing escheat, grant of a motion to dissolve an injunction preventing the operation of California's escheat process is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) on its face, the state's new procedure complies with the due process standard previously established by the Supreme Court; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in dissolving… [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry), … [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
The new Act has extra-territorial effect and has implications for any corporation or group carrying on part of its business in the UK, regardless of where it is incorporated. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
PHIL JOHNSON, Justice. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
She also terminated her relationship with the divorce attorney who was owed fees by the ex-husband in his chapter 13 bankruptcy. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:31 pm
Gary Johnson vetoed the legislation.But I digress. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Johnson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 6:12 am
For their part, mapmakers point out their job is to implement political will, not to determine it. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
She also terminated her relationship with the divorce attorney who was owed fees by the ex-husband in his chapter 13 bankruptcy. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:09 pm
S. 307-308 (1880); Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:20 am
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
United States, 364 U.S. 253; Ex parte Jackson, 96 U.S. 727, 733. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
She also terminated her relationship with the divorce attorney who was owed fees by the ex-husband in his chapter 13 bankruptcy. [read post]
