Search for: "Expressions Originals, Inc" Results 381 - 400 of 4,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
From email: "It was announced on April 2, 2012, that the FTC commissioners, in a 3-to-1 vote, allowed the merger of Express Scripts, Inc. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
  The second outbreak originates from Fresh Express Sunflower Crisp Chopped Salad Kits that has sickened over two dozen in the US and Canada. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:59 am by Susan Ross (US)
We express no opinion on whether these works are sufficiently original . . . or on whether any other prerequisite of a valid copyright has been satisfied. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:59 am by Susan Ross (US)
We express no opinion on whether these works are sufficiently original . . . or on whether any other prerequisite of a valid copyright has been satisfied. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:44 am
[T]he result of a word search is different in purpose, character, expression, meaning, and message from the page (and the book) from which it is drawn. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:58 am
SunTrust Banks, Inc., No. 10-11912 (11th Cir. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:29 am by gmlevine
“Prior UDRP panels have expressed skepticism that a supplemental trademark confers rights to the owner until it is converted into a principal registration,” citing Jahnke & Sons Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:52 pm
The case has its origins in a property lease between petitioner Hall Street, the landlord, and respondent Mattel, Inc., which used the property in its toy manufacturing business. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:13 am by Nadine Banuelos
Copyright protects “original works of authorship” fixed in any tangible medium of expression, such as “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
Indeed, if at least one of the trade mark application’s possible meanings expresses the goods’ and services’ characteristics, its registration must be rejected.Moving on to the judgment in VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK, the Court held that the Board of Appeal had correctly rejected the CTM application because it could not be deployed as origin identifier beyond being a promotional formula. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:42 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
CHL is a service of Red Arch Cultural Heritage Law & Policy Research, Inc. [read post]