Search for: "FLOWERS v. FLOWERS" Results 381 - 400 of 1,177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
In the case of In re Michael Quercia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:00 pm by Richard J. Webb
[Image: Flower vendors in the Main Arcade, Pike Place Market, Seattle, Washington. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:15 pm
I'll pair those readings with the opinions from the same courts in State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:12 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 19/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Canada… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
Not enough basis, though; Flowers’ conviction was affirmed. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm by Eric Rassbach and Hannah Smith
Colorado Civil Rights Commission and its companion (but not-yet-granted) case Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
Pumpkin by Flowers by Walter As summer gives way to autumn and the golden leaves tumble, the prettiest flowers are those that come the florists -- which brings the IPKat on to today's decision in Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, a reference to the Court of the European Union (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
 Letting 1,000 flowers bloom on the fifty State Supreme Courts, as to presidential eligibility requirements, is more likely to produce a weed garden than it is the Rose Garden.The post Trump v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:20 pm by Daniel Nazer
” Patent claims like these are almost surely invalid under the Supreme Court’s Alice v. [read post]