Search for: "FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA" Results 381 - 400 of 576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Events On 29 November 2022, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is hosting a virtual talk on “Contemporary First Amendment Politics” at the California State University. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
– sound recording copyright royalties and cinematographic works (IP Osgoode) Century 21 v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The ECtHR handed down judgement in Marcinkevicius v Lithuania (Application no. 24919/20) on 15 November 2022. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Electoral Commission.   Essay on the Principles of Circumstantial Evidence Illustrated by Numerous Cases 5th English ed. 1 v. (1905) Wills, William; Wills, Alfred (Editor); Beers, George Emerson (Editor); Corbin, Arthur Linton (Editor)   French Law and Practice of Patents for Inventions, Improvements, and Importations From the Paris ed. 1 v. (1834) Perpigna, Antoine   Index and Legislative History Uniform Code… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Google has been fined US$65,000 by a Parisian court because its autocomplete function gave the French word for “crook” (“escroc”) when users searched for the name of insurance company Lyonnaise de Garantie. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The French data regulator the Commission Nationale de I’Informatique et des Libertes has made the request for a preliminary ruling on the matter which concerns jurisdictional and technical domain name issues arising from national extensions. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
France On 22 June 2023, the French data regulator CNIL announced a €40 million sanction against Criteo, one of the world’s largest AdTech companies, for failing to ensure that data subjects had provided their consent to processing, failing to sufficiently inform them and to enable them to exercise their rights. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The French Data Protection Authority has published its annual Activity Report. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) CFI: CTM grant not contrary to Portuguese business name ruling: Alberto Jorge Moreira da Fonseca, Lda v OHIM, General Óptica, SA, intervening (Class 46) CFI confirms refusal of Anheuser-Busch’s BUDWEISER Community trade mark: Anheuser-Busch v OHIM - Budejovicky Budvar (Class 46) (IPKat) (Law360) (Out-Law) ACTA negotiation powers for EU Commission (BLOG@IP::JUR) EU sound recording term extension vote delayed (Excess Copyright) EP divisional applications… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, 447 So.2d 1301, 1305 (Ala. 1984).AlaskaShanks v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Jerry Brown has signed the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act into Law. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:37 pm
Some jurisdictions (Virginia for example) recognize the gestational mother as having parental rights whereas others (California, ICMR guidelines in India for example) confer this right to the genetic mother. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The BBC has been accused of “censoring” a clip of Boris Johnson calling French people “turds” over their Brexit stance while he was Foreign Secretary. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]