Search for: "Fields v. Eu"
Results 381 - 400
of 877
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 2:59 am
The aim of this article is to assess whether the piecemeal regime existing at the EU level risks undermining the protection of EU consumers. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 1:09 am
PatentsPatentlyO reports on Allen v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:53 am
This would make the assessment different from the case of a substantially harmonized right (as it is for the right to be forgotten in CNIL v Google). [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
Karen Yeung (Birmingham Law School) delivered the first keynote speech on “Law, Regulation & Technology: Prospects and pitfalls for a fledgling field”. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:41 am
Both the Supreme Court in the seminal Reno v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:15 am
Eleonora also discusses a case recently decided by the CJEU on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks which might be relevant to situations in which an EU Member State has incorrectly transposed an EU directive into its own national law and consequently have potentially important implications in the field of IP. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:45 am
The relevant public consists of the public at large, including professionals in the fitness, health and wellness fields. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 11:45 am
"The Politics of Expertise and Ignorance in the Field of Migration Management," Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, OnlineFirst, 25 April 2019 - Postprint version of article. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
Further, if a patent is granted early, it will expire early and the public will gain benefits earlier.The Warner Lambert v Generics case again raised the question of whether a patentee can mark out a field in which he will have protection while undertaking further research. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
Premier League v BT, UEFA v BT, Matchroom v BT and Queensberry v BT). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:28 am
Practical implications of the Supreme Court decision The ruling of the Supreme Court in Vedanta has been already called the“the most important judicial decision in the field of business and human rights since the jurisdictional ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum in 2013”. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:53 am
Together with special guest reporter Kats in the form of Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons) and Alexander de Leeuw (Brinkhof), the IPKat will be covering another exciting program of challenging topics in IP covered by the glitterati of the IP field. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
Finally, there was a review of the recent case between Kroma Makeup EU LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
Privacy is not a green field in this respect. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:17 am
Sera Mirzabegian, Big Tobacco v Australia: Challenges to Plain Packaging [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
This Kat definitely needed the evening to process the amount of ideas consumed, but feels more knowledgeable in the field of copyright and the CJEU. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
| Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar | Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 7:19 am
EventsCopyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union - On 26 March IPKat team member Eleonora is organizing a panel discussion on the role of the highest EU court in the field of copyright, on the occasion of the launch of her new book. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 5:33 am
This is why we urge EU policymakers to adopt the directive quickly, as agreed in trilogue negotiations. [read post]
