Search for: "Frank Shields"
Results 381 - 400
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2021, 8:07 am
I love these privileges as much as the next litigator, but it’s time to admit that efforts to shield post-breach investigations through the attorney work-product and attorney-client privileges (the “counsel privileges”) are bad for cybersecurity. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm
This is the latest entry in my lengthy archive of writing, talks, and interviews about the EARN IT Act: Blog posts at the CIS blog: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5, part 6, part 7, part 8 Articles for Brookings TechStream: part 1, part 2 Talks at the DEFCON Crypto & Privacy Village and the University of Waterloo Interviews on the Decipher Security Podcast and ExpressVPN blog On January 31, Senator Richard Blumenthal, together with 18 co-sponsors from both parties, reintroduced the EARN IT… [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:45 am
The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
Don’t look now, but the law of executive privilege has undergone a substantial shift. [read post]
17 May 2019, 11:41 am
’” I don’t think that Mueller’s decision to avoid making a prosecutorial decision was motivated by an effort to shield his legal analysis from OLC overruling, but this effect was a foreseeable consequence of his decision. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
Each entity and individual operating in China must make a frank assessment of the risks of working within the existing system. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:16 am
Present at the meeting were Chief Harris, PPD Executive Assistant Chief Joseph Yahner, PPD Commander Robert Handy, City Manager Frank Fairbanks, Assistant City Manager Alton Washington, City Attorney Gary Verberg and PPD Legal Advisor Lieutenant Eric Edwards. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:59 am
We might also end up with Protected Conversations, which will supposedly allow employers and employees to have full and frank chats about problems in their employment relationship and sort things out without the need for throwing of toys and rushing off in a sulk to an Employment Tribunal. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Franks applies these rules, and in the process in some small measure reaffirms government employee speech protection. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
Absolutely – disclosure is the shield, and disclosure should be a client’s right. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:15 am
” Indeed, the appeals court emphasized that the First Amendment necessarily protects some expressions related to the speaker’s job, noting that the Supreme Court reiterated earlier this year, in Lane v Franks, that speech by public employees “holds special value precisely because those employees gain knowledge of matters of public concern through their employment. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir. 1997) ("obsessive-compulsive disorder," which the court concluded was not sufficiently stigmatized); Doe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
Usage of the Faculty Senate Footage to Critique PSU Is a Fair Use, and Clearly Does Not Violate Copyright A copyright is not a complete bar on any other use of the copyrighted work, and a copyright cannot be used by government entities as a shield against criticism. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
From the States and Municipalities: California: Banning Man Wins $220,000 from State Political Watchdog PanelRiverside Press-Enterprise – Craig Schultz | Published: 9/7/2018 Frank Burgess was awarded more than $200,000 in legal fees after a court found the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) violated his Constitutional protections related to a fine levied against him as a member of a nonprofit hospital board. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 7:10 am
Some people even get so clever (by half) that they put their money in a trust thinking that the trust will shield the assets from division in divorce court. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm
The 1980 report which created the foundation for FIPPA, the “Public Government for Private People: The Report of the Commission on Freedom of Information and Individual Privacy” (also known as the Williams Commission), explained the reasons for this as follows, If Cabinet discussions were to become a matter of public record, individual ministers would be inhibited from expressing their frank opinions for fear of later being identified as dissidents. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
This is as unhelpful as the description of the Libel Reform Campaign as being the media corporations’ “human shield”. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
” These actions were not protected by academic freedom, however broad that right might be: [T]he academic freedom concept is not so wide as to shield a professor from actions or behaviour that cannot be construed as a reasonable exercise of his responsibilities in an academic setting…The University is not disciplining Professor Rancourt for his ideas or beliefs in regards to his teaching method based on self-centered motivation and evaluation. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:55 am
Of course there can never be ultimate consensus on what constitutes responsible behavior, which is why a frank discussion of what people are actually doing is essential. [read post]
