Search for: "GRANT et al v. HOLDER et al" Results 381 - 400 of 463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the claims of Beal Bank. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
Cook-Deegan et al., Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: Comparing breast and ovarian cancers with colon cancers, GENET. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by admin
” (Attorney General Eric Holder, April 11, 2012) “This was competition on the merits, with Apple providing a superior reading platform on a beautiful 10 inch iPad screen, with color, multi-media, and fixed display, and access to millions of future iPad purchasers. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by Lyle Denniston
The 6-2 decision (with Justice Elena Kagan not taking part) came in the case of Golan, et al., v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
Burbank High School Vocal Music Association, et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
The correct analysis was that the infringer must have intended to distribute much more widely than to one downloader, and thus his acts amounted to an attempt to distribute to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the copyright owner.Laddie et al (5th), [20.26], p 823, referring to the phrase in section 23(d) of the CDPA, calls it “a sweeping up provision which would appear to cover most forms of handling of infringing copies not covered elsewhere. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(Builds on scholars such as Sean Seymore and Ben Roin; see also Krieger et al. on drug novelty. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
Had Google gotten their way, Viacom would have had to join forces with Premier League et al to file one appeal brief. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:01 am by Anthony J. Vecchio
" Every applicant for a license under classification b. shall be a holder of a basic driver's license. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Judge Bea, dissenting, would have sent the case to a jury on the hypothesized IIC about affiliation between MTM and Luminox et al. [read post]