Search for: "German v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 1,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2017, 6:09 am by David Markus
Liang is a German citizen.At the hearing on Friday morning, Judge Cox said that Liang was a member of a long-term conspiracy and that the scandal was “a stunning fraud on American consumers,” a courthouse observer told Law360.Liang’s attorney, Daniel V. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm by Florian Mueller
(This works the same way in the United States, by the way.)The actual economic impact of this enforcement on Apple remains to be seen. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:30 am by Ashley Binetti
Escobar, and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Peter Swire, Jesse Woo, Deven Desai
More broadly, the United States, Germany and other countries set limits on campaign expenditures for foreigners, compared to broader rights for those in the country to participate in the election. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:34 pm by Bart Torvik
You might have thought the case, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:35 am by Stephen Pitel
The court reviewed several scholarly articles on the issue from around the world and also considered jurisprudence from several other countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
They led the way into Normandy on D-Day, and stopped the Germans cold in the Battle of the Bulge and bailed Ike out. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
International Law, United States' Imperialism and Latin America- Hemispherism, inter-Americanism, and Pan-Americanism- U.S. interventions and imperialism (e.g. the Mexican-American War)- The Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary- Etc.4. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
Thomas trial, believed to be the first RIAA case to go to trial in the United States.) **10/4/07, 12:44 AM. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 1996, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Daniel J. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:53 am by Rosalind English
Switzerland (no. 2) no. 32772/02, § 92, ECHR 2009 (rearing of animals)[Grand Chamber- GC]; Steel and Morris v . the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, §§ 89 and 95, ECHR 2005-II (fast-food meat industry); Hashman and Harrup v . the United Kingdom[GC], no. 25594/94 (hunting saboteurs); Steel and Others v . the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998 (hunting saboteurs); Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v . [read post]