Search for: "Givens v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 381 - 400 of 447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
An American report from November 2011 examines ‘Jurors’ Use of Social Media During Trials and Deliberations‘. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
But the Secure Training Centre Rules are more specific. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
The first libel judgment of the year was given on 11 January 2011 – in Cambridge v Makin ([2011] EWHC 12 (QB)). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:04 am by Cian Murphy
NS was joined with an Irish case, ME & Others v Refugee Applications Commissioner & MEJLR (C-493/10), which raised similar questions for EU law. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
Board of Education), has tried to enable localized immigrant bashing, and has proposed crazy attacks on the federal income tax and the Social Security system. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:45 am
Commissioner of Social Security, the Eastern District of New York remind the Social Secuirty Administration that at least some of the responsibility for developing a full and accurate picture of a Social Security disability benefits claimant's alleged disability belongs to the Social Security Administration (SSA) and its judges. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:22 am by Graeme Hall
JG & Anor v Lancashire County Council [2011] EWHC 2295 (Admin) (02 September 2011), Judicial review of council’s multi-million pound cuts to disabled and social care services fails on High Court. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]