Search for: "Givens v. Miller"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2019, 2:09 pm
This could suggest that courts may consider purely legal questions concerning the interpretation of Article V, but not factual questions concerning whether a given state has actually ratified a particular amendment. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit erred under Miller-El v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:13 am
Legal Background In Miller v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
Further, the lead agency is given “the benefit of the doubt on any legitimate, disputed issues of credibility” (quoting Pocket Protectors v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
The phone hacking saga continues with Byline Investigates reporting that Sienna Miller and Sir Simon Hughes have launched claims against the Sun. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Frese v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
From 2013 to 2016, ACA premiums in CA increased by 12% given the pervasiveness of vertical integration between these two groups [27]. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
From 2013 to 2016, ACA premiums in CA increased by 12% given the pervasiveness of vertical integration between these two groups [27]. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
In 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
See Gobitis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Simmons (joined by Stevens), rendering minors ineligible for the death sentence, was bolstered by its 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am
The Advocate General’s appeal in the case of Cherry is dismissed and Mrs Miller’s appeal is allowed. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Lord Garnier QC says that if the evidence was not credible, it would be odd that the PM could insulate himself from questioning about it. 1230: Lord Garnier QC says that it would be very difficult not to infer that any evidence given by the Prime Minister would be adverse to his case. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
However, he submits that the Government should not be given the benefit of the doubt given the way in which the documents have been produced. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
The Lord President of the Court of Session used the concept of “legitimate political considerations” in his judgment. 15:05: Lord Keen QC notes European Union Withdrawal Act No.2 was passed in two days, showing that Parliament had enough time to pass legislation in the time given once it became clear Parliament would be prorogued. [read post]
