Search for: "Gooding v. Oliver" Results 381 - 400 of 621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 6:24 am by Edith Garwood
CAT equipment has been used to uproot olive trees and destroy other agricultural products and land. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:05 pm by J
And we sometimes find that the goal of writing one single field-transforming paper can be more self-defeating or paralyzing than writing two very good papers. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 7:41 am
" [abstract] [full paper] Hila Keren, Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, "Law in the Cultivation of Hope" [abstract] [full paper] Elizabeth V. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
 The Proposal aims to reinforce customs actions in fighting the trade in IPR infringing goods. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:24 am by Edith Garwood
CAT equipment has been used to uproot olive trees and destroy other agricultural products and land. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
  Didn't Oliver Wendell Holmes give it a big push with The Common Law in 1909 or so? [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
A justice can be a visionary without being excellent and even without being especially good. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am by Richard Goldfarb
 As we noted, it took the AMS over 60 years to redo its olive oil standards; can that overworked agency really be expected to decide what is a sweet onion quickly? [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Is a “republican” society organized around the quest for a common good that will be sought by suitably socialized citizens destined to become a distinctly more “liberal” order that accepts the priority of individual interests and the psychology associated with self-seeking (ultimately defined so memorably by Oliver Wendell Holmes in terms of his completely egoistic “bad man” concerned only with maximizing individual utilities)? [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ “Bad Man” theory of how you set up the law. [read post]
As Oliver Wendell Holmes put it, “three generations of imbeciles are enough. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Dawn Oliver, also posting on UKCLB, considers that this debate is unwinnable for the courts, as Parliament has popular support (by definition), so the judges must adhere to the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty as a matter of practicality. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Video Performance Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) Good news for the UK’s IP law service providers and perhaps for others too (IAM) Two bites at the cherry but not enhanced costs: Wragg v Donnelly (PatLit) United States US General NY Times review ‘Common as Air’: History of IP (Trademark Blog) US Patent Reform RIP Patent Reform 2010? [read post]