Search for: "Grand Jury Subpoena v. US"
Results 381 - 400
of 548
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Hadijah, v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
These processes and are currently being utilized on a grand scale by groups referred to as “copyright trolls” (“troll”).v Unlike the prototypical ‘content owners versus file sharer’ battle that has heretofore been pursued, this revived model brings a new third party to the bargaining table. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
Recently, I received a grand jury subpoena to produce documents — and learned that the Food and Drug Administration, the FBI, and the Department of Justice are each investigating whether our company violated criminal laws by shipping a medical device that the government believes had not been approved for use by the FDA. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
U.S arises from the use of a Grand Jury Subpoena to compel the taxpayer to produce records of foreign bank accounts. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:22 am
Attorney forthe Northern District of Ohio in September of 2011, a Cleveland federal grand jury indicted Jason Jurek, “age 41,” with “with receiving visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and possessing child pornography” in violation of federal law. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:36 pm
So the pension fund has requested that all the documents that Google produced under subpoena to the Google Drugs grand jury in Rhode Island (where the case was being prosecuted) be produced by Google in the pension fund case. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:51 pm
The ABA’s paragraph (e) regarding limitations on subpoenaing lawyers to grand juries or other legal proceedings is viewed as unnecessary, as there are adequate safeguards in place for federal prosecutors, and the Utah criminal justice system does not typically use the grand jury procedure. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:43 pm
Most boldly, the government goes for it and argues that there simply is no First Amendment academic’s privilege: There is no recognized privilege for reporters to shield their sources or refuse to testify in a criminal grand jury investigation, let alone a recognized “academic privilege” that may be invoked to withhold evidence. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:34 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, supra. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED MARCH 25, 2011 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:36 pm
Because the forensic examiners were unable to view the encrypted portions of the hard drives, a grand jury subpoena was issued to Doe requiring him to decrypt the contents of the computer hard drives. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Case no. 11-12268 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
On the other hand, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit sitting in Atlanta held yesterday in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated March 25, 2011 that forcing a suspect to decrypt a computer or produce a decrypted version of the files on the computer is testimonial, and therefore does trigger Fifth Amendment protection. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm
The 11th Circuit just decided In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum March 25, 2011, USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
[FN3] The government issued a grand jury subpoena to John Doe to come and open the encrypted files. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) The important decision is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
., for instance, asked Verrilli if the government could criminalize lying about whether one received a high school diploma.In other news, the 11th Circuit came out with a fascinating opinion today (In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011 USA v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:15 pm
Id. at 1414, citing In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527 (2d Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F3d 910 (8th Cir. 1997); In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, (D.C. [read post]
