Search for: "Grant v. Arkansas Supreme Court" Results 381 - 400 of 627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2014, 8:18 am by Andy Taylor
 She expressed concern, however, that there could be “a harsh result under slightly different circumstances,” and suggested that the Arkansas Supreme Court revisit Rule 52. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:27 am by Lyle Denniston
In a second granted case, Plumhoff v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:41 am by Howard Friedman
Hobbs, (Docket No. 13-6827) will terminate either when the Court denies Holt's petition for certiorari, or, if it grants the petition, when the Court enters its judgment. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm by Mary Dwyer
Nova Health Systems 12-1170Issue: (1) Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in declaring the Oklahoma Ultrasound Act, which requires the performance, display, and explanation of a pre-abortion ultrasound, to be facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
  The Court denied cert. in Marek v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm by Mary Dwyer
Deviney 13-264Issue: (1) Whether the decision of the Florida Supreme Court, holding that a suspect expressing his desire to go home unequivocally and unambiguously invoked his right to remain silent under Miranda v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
There are those who say the Supreme Court involves itself in too much of American life. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm by David Kopel
The Supreme Court found the trial court’s reasoning so persuasive that the Supreme Court could not engage it, or b. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:21 am by Rick E. Rayl
  Following the decisions in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
The Supreme Court has identified certain types of speech that require a court to do a balancing of interests based on the particular facts of the case before the court. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:42 am by Bexis
  But we suspect that Bell took this tack because of Bartlett pending in the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Louisiana 12-1302Issue: (1) Whether the Court should modify Mickens v. [read post]