Search for: "Grant v. People"
Results 381 - 400
of 15,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Nothing else was learn from talking to the people in the car to justify further detention, and the motion to suppress was properly granted. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
And I'm sufficiently worried about convicting innocent people that this is a problem for me.Obviously one way to avoid this is simply not to let people defend themselves, and I think there's something to that -- even though there's a whole lot on the other side as well. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:48 pm
In the case of JRV & ARC v BRG [2023] EWHC 2238 (KB) Mr Justice Ritchie granted an interim privacy injunction preventing the publication of information about an extra-marital affair. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
How many people are granted bail each day? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 6:28 pm
Weber has granted the defendant's request for oral argument of the pending motions in Elektra Entertainment Group v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 4:11 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
See Mazza v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:42 am
The trial judge, Joan Weber, granted the motion and dismissed the information. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
It holds that even though there's a California Supreme Court case seemingly on point granting the motion to suppress, that case is distinguishable because there the officer actually saw the temporary tag, whereas here the officer didn't bother to look. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:03 pm
Especially after it granted defendant's (form) motion in limine to let the defendant wear "civilian" clothes at trial? [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
In Roe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:47 pm
., if a subsequent case thinks, contra Justice Premo, that the new case is wrong, and the old case is still right -- then grant review. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:42 pm
., a principal granting "consent" for his agent (attorney, employee, etc.) to secretly tape? [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:29 pm
Which I'll now do:The California Supreme Court should grant review of this opinion.I'm not saying that because I believe Justice Kriegler's decision to be necessarily wrong and/or pernicious. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 2:44 pm
Appellate courts grant lower courts huge leeway in this arena, so I'm not surprised in the slightest that the California Supreme Court finds that there was no reversible error.Nonetheless, I thought the dynamic in the trial court warranted at least mention.It's a murder case (of course), so at the penalty phase, the prosecution has the murdered victim's seven year old brother testify. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 8:28 am
In People v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:38 am
Teleflex, the court said that patent examiners and judges need to look broadly at how creative people normally combine ideas to solve problems instead of relying on narrow, rigid tests to determine whether an innovation is worthy of a patent monopoly. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:05 am
The Court also vacated its earlier grant of leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
