Search for: "Grant v. Royal"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am
Well, excuse me, but I respect trademark registrations too darned much to treat them as royal grants of franchise or monopoly over a term that a pliant Examining Attorney green lights through the sausage machine! [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
Royal Ins. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent casesGuest post from Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy), summarizing 2017's recent patent decisions. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:56 am
Royal & Sunalliance Insurance Company, 307 F. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 11:54 am
Authority and Ownership at 555 Lord Mansfield’s judgement in Liardet v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Sir Oliver Letwin – the Minister responsible for devising the Royal Charter backed system of press regulation – said that if the Government fails to enact section 40 it will face “tench warfare” in Parliament. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 10:28 am
In Saxon v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 10:28 am
In Saxon v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, 586. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, 586. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
If SCOTUS grants cert, it will set up an incredibly high-stakes battle royale over the future and fate of Section 230. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
Be that as it may, the IP Act grants broad general powe [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
If the lengthy incubation has produced a swan, it is one whose feathers are already looking distinctly ruffled following the CJEU judgment in Watson/Tele2, issued three weeks after Royal Assent. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Leaves to Appeal Granted Criminal Law: Dangerous Offenders; ConstitutionalityR. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that the Government’s attempt to effect these changes using the royal prerogative offends the imperative rule of our constitution. 15.18 The Lord Advocate for the Scottish Government, the Rt Hon W. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
In 2003 he advised the UK government during the Hutton inquiry and the Royal Household in its privacy battle with the Daily Mirror. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
It suggests that 6 remain active with one having been granted this year. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
Continue reading → The post Royalty Interests and Antitrust: Waggoner v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Ireland In the case of Gilchrist v Sunday Newspapers ([2016] IECA 296) the Court of Appeal granted an application by the police that defamation proceedings be held in camera. [read post]
