Search for: "Greene v. Superior Court" Results 381 - 400 of 483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
L.J. 135, 141 (2012) (reaching the opposite conclusion that I do below—i.e., that the burden should be on the defendant to establish qualified immunity); Aisha Green, Comment, Comparing Dadd v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Doe, 2011 ONSC 4663 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ordered an anonymous blogger sued by a defendant in the Lawbuzz defamation case to reveal his or her identity. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Dylan Gibbs
But a green apple buyer who receives red apples has an identity issue. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Dylan Gibbs
But a green apple buyer who receives red apples has an identity issue. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1353 (Cal. 1996); MacDonald v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: Supreme Court to hear case on inducing patent infringement: Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
Superior Court that require all rental properties meet a minimum standard of habitability. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Messier, 2014 QCCS 357 (judgment in French) the Quebec Superior Court awarded Can$5,000 moral damages and Can$5,000 punitive damages in respect of defamatory allegations published on the internet. [read post]