Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,075
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
Chamber of Commerce has filed amicus briefs asking the justices to review several pending cert petitions in cases that “test the circumstances under which businesses can be ‘haled into court,’ as some briefs put it, in certain states when parties have weak or nonexistent connections to those states. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am
According to Lady Hale, failing to exempt A from the “bedroom tax” was discriminatory “in the sense described in Thlimmenos v Greece: treating her like any other single parent with one child when in fact she ought to be treated differently” (at [75]). [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Lady Hale (Lord Carnwath agreeing) dissented in relation to A. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
In R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3, Baroness Hale noted that Article 8 had been held to include the right to establish and develop relationships with others. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
It is difficult to conceive of a case that better fits this description than R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
On the first day after a long Thanksgiving weekend, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, a petition filed by Samsung earlier this month for a further rehearing en banc in an Apple v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
Summary judgment was granted against his federal and state-law discrimination claims (MacEachern v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
Special Preview: Lord Millett on Prerogative Power and Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty As mentioned above, Volume 7 of the Yearbook includes a short article written by Lord Millett concerning the upcoming Article 50/Brexit appeal (Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union). [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58R (on the application of Carmichael and Rourke) (formerly known as MA and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) R (on the application of Daly and others) (formerly known as MA and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) R (on the application of A)… [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Monday’s argument agenda also included State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
Applying the recent ECHR cases of Genovese v Malta (2012) App no. 53124/09 and Kuric v Slovenia (2012) App no. 26828/06, Lady Hale held that ECHR, art 8 is engaged because the denial of citizenship significantly affects a person’s social identity. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 2:34 am
Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment, with which the other justices agreed. [read post]
