Search for: "HARDING v. U. S" Results 381 - 400 of 1,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Listing Available Files 7 If a registered user wants to list available files stored in his computer’s hard drive on Napster for others to access, he must first create a “user library” directory on his computer’s hard drive. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
  The most trenchant of them was offered by Judge David Sentelle in  United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Orin Kerr
The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an important electronic privacy case, United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by Mandy Perry
 The order appointed an independent IT expert to investigate the defendant’s personal computer and hard drive to see if they contained the employer’s confidential information – or to see if that information had been deleted. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
I’m nonetheless having difficulty giving the benefit of the doubt to most of what happened in Verkhoglyad v Benimovich, 2017 NY Slip Op 51133(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 12, 2017], a case recently decided by the Brooklyn Supreme Court in which it denied enforcement of a mandatory forum selection clause, disregarded the operating agreement’s New Jersey choice-of-law provision by applying New York law to various… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
I’m nonetheless having difficulty giving the benefit of the doubt to most of what happened in Verkhoglyad v Benimovich, 2017 NY Slip Op 51133(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 12, 2017], a case recently decided by the Brooklyn Supreme Court in which it denied enforcement of a mandatory forum selection clause, disregarded the operating agreement’s New Jersey choice-of-law provision by applying New York law to various… [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s May, 2015 decision in Tibble v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 2:15 pm by Gene Quinn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a decision in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The question of proprietary algorithms would stand to be determined under the Crown’s disclosure obligations under R v Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 SCR 326. [read post]