Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,885
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court placed Chung v. the People of California on hold pending its decision in Troyer. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:25 am
Today's LA Times finally features an obit of Hillel Chodos, "a leading California trial lawyer, who during his 53-year career handled over a thousand trial cases and hundreds of appeals," and a founding member of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers.The DJ also serves up Los Angeles Restaurants Sued for Price Fixing, about Imhoff v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:34 am
California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965). [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:13 am
Toy and Wren also relied on the California Court of Appeals' decision in People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
And here Justice Scalia’s words, citing U.S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
LEXIS 49891 (CD CA, March 14, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed complaints by four plaintiffs, who were held overnight on a stolen vehicle charge that their religious head dresses and spiritual jewelry were forcibly removed. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Alicia Gutierrez-Romine’s timely, meticulous study of the world of criminal abortion in California offers a powerful glimpse of where we might be heading next. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:46 pm
On appeal, the court focused on the general duty of care and the exceptions stated in the California Supreme Court case of Rowland v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
Monday’s coverage of the Court continues to focus on Perry v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:53 pm
In Porter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
LEXIS 1965 (ED CA, Jan. 7, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge permitted a Rastafarian inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was not permitted to wear his religiously required head covering-- a crown-- into the health care facility visiting room.In Rezaq v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
Samsung, California, Cellphones, Expert Witnesses, Federal Judges, Fight! [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
See Sanchez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:26 am
Under California law, they moved to dismiss the suit under California's anti-SLAPP law. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
ILP Subject Headings class certification class actions employment discrimination employment discrimination California employment discrimination sex regulatory compliance Other Articles Daniel M. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am
I assume this case is headed to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
On August 4, 2010, the decision was reached in Perry et al v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:29 am
In O'Donoghue v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:01 pm
In apparently the only California decision to address the issue head on, Perkins v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 9:27 pm
The contentions about the efficacy of the “ethical wall” failed because “California rejects ethical walls,” even though the “law in California might well be headed in that direction. [read post]
