Search for: "Hale v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:05 am
State: Here, the CCA affirmed the lower court's determination that Schmidt should've gotten lesser included offense instructions for assault by threat and assault by bodily injury in this retaliation case out of Hale County. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am by Michael Caruso
Zerbst, and Gideon was a decision about incorporating the right and applying it to the states. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
These appeals are being heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Judge, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:35 am
One of the beautiful things about the US is that every state has its own law. [read post]
As Baroness Hale DPSC said in Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2014] AC 591 , para 35: “The authorities are all agreed that the starting point is a strong presumption that it is in a person’s best interests to stay alive. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am by INFORRM
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
The lead judgment is by Baroness Hale, who rehearses the history of the NAA and in particular the interaction with immigration law after R v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council, Ex parte M (1997) 30 HLR 10 S.21 now states: Subject to and in accordance with the provisions of this Part of this Act, a local authority may with the approval of the Secretary of State, and to such extent as he may direct shall, make arrangements for providing: (a) residential… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Authored by Mark Flanagan, Patrick Carome and Ari Holtzblatt of Wilmer Hale. * GitHub Letter. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am by CMS
The court considered a number of authorities in this regard, including X and Y v The Netherlands (App no 8978/80) and KU v Finland (App no 2872/02), in which the Strasbourg court had indicated that ECHR, art 8 placed a positive obligation on states to put in place effective deterrence measures against activities which may pose a threat to fundamental values and essential aspects of the private lives of individuals, particularly children and other vulnerable persons. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am by INFORRM
The judgment The leading judgment at the Supreme Court was given jointly by Lady Hale and Lord Toulson. [read post]