Search for: "Handy v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
Justice Jackson made this point in a barb at Justice Frankfurter in West Virginia State Bd of Educ. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:11 am by SHG
The Second Circuit has handed down a very important new Fourth Amendment case, United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
Merpel thinks this event could actually be quite handy for IP students. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  That was the focus of the 2nd District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
 This isn't always useful for professional purposes, but it was really handy for Ilonka, whose day job was selling castles and stately homes. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
However, in welcoming new readers we take this opportunity to alert them to this handy facility. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
Although the regulations governing use of a Community collective mark must authorise any person whose goods or services do originate in the geographical area as a member of the proprietor association, it does not prevent that association from stating in those regulations that undertakings which collaborate with bodies whose goods originate from the geographical area or use the goods of the association as their raw materials, without being established in, or having their goods originate… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:55 pm
To this end, the UK's Intellectual Property Office has posted this page on its website with some fresh links to model agreements and some handy guidance. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
 There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
Two years after the Katz decision, in the case of Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:55 am
Finally Matt addressed industrial applicability, there being a new case to cite in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences Inc, as well as a string of perpetual motion machines. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:30 am
  Exhibit A in that regard is Riches v. [read post]