Search for: "Harmon v. Long"
Results 381 - 400
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
Washington Post Article Wall Street Journal Article The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:23 am
Reply Brief, Harmon v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:25 pm
Helvetica Servicing, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:50 pm
Orthodox Diocese v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:13 pm
In the classic case of Loretto v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
A rare few books that were written by a Justice but discovered long after he died are included in the total tally as in the case of Robert Jackson’s That Man: An Insider’s Portrait of Franklin D. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
The program of harmonization and unification of conflicts of laws (“Rome I”–“Rome V” and more) obliges to describe the scope of each regulation. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am
Panel 2—U.S. and EU Perspectives on Trademark and Design Law in the Next Decade Annette Kur, Senior Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law; Associate Professor, Stockholm University Two regimes coexisting at the community level and harmonized national law; both regimes are interlinked in terms of prior rights in one creating barriers to rights in another. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
EU v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:47 am
The suit in Mendoza v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 1:03 pm
That case, Digitrex, Inc. v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
Furthermore, where there is prior experimental use, such use could continue to the extent it is ongoing, and therefore the defense is arguably broadened for long-standing and ongoing experiments and equipment. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
” In the case of Jones v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
In Yee v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm
Post-Case Analysis: It’s Over, But Not Over The Supreme Court has a long history of eliminating presumptions, and even lenient standards (see Winter v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:18 am
ECOPRESS v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:11 am
The 6-2 decision (with Justice Elena Kagan not taking part) came in the case of Golan, et al., v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:36 pm
So long as the agreement allows employees to pursue collective/classwide relief in some forum--arbitral or judicial--it will not violate the NLRA. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:56 am
I defy anyone to harmonize the results in Floyd and Sharps. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 3:17 pm
However, the rulemaking was stayed as a result of Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
