Search for: "Harris v. Stephens" Results 381 - 400 of 627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2017, 7:49 am by Scott Bomboy
The practice goes back to Harry Reid’s time as Senate Majority Leader. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
"It appears that at least some in the Senate also support adding trustees.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:35 pm by Stephen M. Fuerch
The answer correctly summarized the state of the law of mixed-motive defenses following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Danilack, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Sunday, February 4, 2024 Tags: Activism, AI, Artificial intelligence, data analytics, Environment, litigation, Public disclosures, Risk management, SEC, Sustainability, technology Caremark Claim Based on Business Risks Dismissed Posted by Richard Horvath, Stephen Leitzell, and Taylor Jaszewski, Dechert LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Business risk, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, In re Caremark, Legal… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Danilack, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Sunday, February 4, 2024 Tags: Activism, AI, Artificial intelligence, data analytics, Environment, litigation, Public disclosures, Risk management, SEC, Sustainability, technology Caremark Claim Based on Business Risks Dismissed Posted by Richard Horvath, Stephen Leitzell, and Taylor Jaszewski, Dechert LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Business risk, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, In re Caremark, Legal… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am by Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker
Kennedy never joined calls from members of the court (Justices Harry Blackmun, John Paul Stevens, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg) to reconsider the constitutionality of the death penalty as a punishment, but his jurisprudential glosses on the court’s proportionality doctrine arguably strengthen the case for judicial abolition. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
” along with an opinion piece by solicitor Charlotte Harris. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris.] [read post]