Search for: "Hawes v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Haw. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:51 am
Haw.). [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Haw. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:21 pm
Haw. 2006), where a state statute which imposed a pre-employment residency requirement for public employment was declared unconstitutional. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:48 pm
Haw., 1998). [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:18 am
The Mayor of London v Hall & Ors [2010] EWHC 1613 (QB) (29 June 2010) - Read judgment The Mayor of London has won a court order to evict a camp of protesters from Parliamentary Square, with the High Court stating that his response to the protest was proportionate and not a breach of the protesters’ human rights. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
March 9, 2010) (“the plain language of the statute states that it only applies when the local defendants have been ‘properly joined and served’”); Haseko Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:09 am
Burge v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
See Zamsky v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:43 am
Moreover, the Hawaii Supreme Court has also expressed its concern for the abuse of the Motion for Reconsideration, stating, in Gossinger v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:57 am
Code § 16600; Haw. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:03 am
Village of Port Chester and Krimstock v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:29 pm
Citation: U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am
Haw! [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
NORMAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
LouieDocket: 11-336Issue(s): (1) Whether petitioners have standing to seek a refund of their own taxes; and (2) whether the Equal Protection Clause precludes a state or municipality from creating tax exemptions that are available only to members of a certain race.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Haw. [read post]
