Search for: "Hay v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
The Ruling The BSC rejected the appeal by ruling as follows: “It stems from the text of the provisions of Articles 1, 2 and 7 of the [1995 GCC Convention on the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments] as ratified by Bahrain in [1996], and the established practice of this Court, that judgments of a GCC Member State rendered in civil, commercial, administrative matters as well as personal status matters that become final [in the State of origin] shall be enforced by the… [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 7:47 am
That state of affairs is a pity but suggests the Gordian knot both states have now worked furiously to create and preserve remains undisturbed. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Defendant also fails to attach a copy of its own answer, but does not state that its motion is one for pre-answer dismissal. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
The revelations came in a hearing in the case of Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and others - naming suspended Sheriff Peter Watson amid a series of allegations in relation to the £400m collapse of the Heather Capital Hedge Fund. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
” When you go to school with John Smith, Tyrone Washington, and Marion Coatsworth-Hay, everybody wins.Except for the people who didn’t get in, but think they should have because of a standardized test. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 3:33 am
La respuesta más simple a estas interrogantes se contesta en la afirmativa, puesto que las entidades privadas no están sujetas a las obligaciones que conllevan la primera enmienda, debido a que no hay acción por parte del estado (state action)7. [read post]
Guest Post: DABUS Gains Traction: South Africa Becomes First Country to Recognize AI-Invented Patent
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 8:22 am
En cambio, no hay ninguna señal de que las autoridades estén dispuestas a abrir la mano en los consi [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
The FTC does not state any objective criterion for the alleged difference in performance. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Family Voices Coordinators participate in several groups within the state, including Title V/CSHCN, DD Council, Part C agency, CHIP board and parent and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
The article is here; the Introduction: As articulated by Justice Brandeis in Whitney v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:33 am
Part V: Cultural Property. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:33 pm
Gore (de 1996) y luego en State Farm v. [read post]
