Search for: "He, et al v. Holder" Results 381 - 400 of 412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Capitol County Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al., No. 08-cv-392, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2009 WL 42603 (W.D. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:27 pm
Solicitor General’s brief in opposition in Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
The Prime Minister of Canada et al.,  Federal Court Judge James W. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:47 am
Earth Island Institute, et al. (07-463). [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 12:20 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
” The ruling came in the case of Kiyemba, et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:06 pm
[t]he owner or holder of the lien fails to file an action to foreclose the lien in the county where the property is located not later than thirty (30) days after receiving the notice. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
The case is Capitol Records Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]