Search for: "Head v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 6,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
The justices hold that the ALJs ARE "officers of the United States" for purposes of the Appointments Clause.AND: Another case is Pereira v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:08 am by brettb
The state appeals court affirmed, relying on Geier v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:23 am by INFORRM
Can they still do that when the President of the United States has confirmed the records’ existence via tweet? [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 8:29 am by Howard Friedman
United States, (3d Cir., Dec. 12, 2014), the 3rd Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's claim that a correctional officer's pat down search of his genital area violated his free exercise rights because his religion prohibits homosexual activity.In Goninan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
The Wall Street Journal reported today that the Wisconsin trade secrets case of United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:49 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
Basically, you're allowed to talk about violence in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:49 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
Basically, you're allowed to talk about violence in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:00 am
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Briggs Ave. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:10 am by David Lynn
Securities and Exchange Commission, the Supreme Court held that SEC ALJs are “Officers of the United States” under the Appointments Clause of the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:33 am by Orin Kerr
As regular readers might recall, I filed a pro bono cert petition in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 9:10 am
The United States Supreme Court has taken a case from the Southern District of Florida, U.S. v. [read post]