Search for: "Held v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 381 - 400 of 449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
” June 2011 A libel claim brought by a social worker involved in the “Baby P” case, Sylvia Henry v News Group Newspapers, settled before reaching trial. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
Board of Education), has tried to enable localized immigrant bashing, and has proposed crazy attacks on the federal income tax and the Social Security system. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am by Eric
Deeply-held ideological considerations drives privacy norms. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 9:01 am
Commissioner of Social Security, however, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a person can also seek benefits based on a mental impairment that has not been formally treated. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5155 September 8, 2011 Judge: Briscoe Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Petitioner Becky Jean Willig appealed an opinion and order entered by a United States Magistrate Judge that affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) denying her application for supplemental security income benefits. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am by Matthew Flinn
Voyias v Information Commissioner and the London Borough of Camden EA/2011/0007 – Read Judgment The First Tier Tribunal has overturned a decision of the Information Commissioner and ordered Camden Council to provide information about empty properties in the borough to a former member of the Advisory Service for Squatters. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm by G. Randolph Rice, Jr.
(b) Commissioner. -- "Commissioner" means a District Court commissioner appointed in accordance with Article IV, § 41G of the Maryland Constitution. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm by elemembers
However, it held that unless the payments were actually linked to mileage they could not be classed as ‘relevant motoring expenditure’ for the purpose of the Social Security (Contributions) Regulations 2001, as amended. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm by elemembers
However, it held that unless the payments were actually linked to mileage they could not be classed as ‘relevant motoring expenditure’ for the purpose of the Social Security (Contributions) Regulations 2001, as amended. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
It further held that to the extent that any of its decisions suggested otherwise (citing Matter of McGrath v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:14 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
Supreme Court has held that posthumously conceived children are not automatically entitled to receive social security survivor benefits. [read post]