Search for: "Herring v. Reed"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
Reed’s fiancée, Usha Peart, was sitting in the front passenger seat and held a female pit bull in her lap. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm
That was not the basis on which Slade J reached her conclusion, and nor is it the key proposition advanced by Ms Gumbel QC. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
In her Christmas speech to British forces in Akrotiri, the prime minister celebrated the downfall of ISIS. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
The case was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lady Black. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:33 am
Sazerac Company, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am
OJ Simpson: faced forced transfer of his IP, including his book, released under a cover that looked like it said “I Did It” instead of “If I Did It”Reed v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
., American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, Reed Elsevier, Inc., American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, Songwriters Guild of America, and AmSong, Inc.; Joel M. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A claimant’s impairment is “severe” if it meets the standard of Stone v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:58 am
Reed, 5th Dist. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
See Mulraney v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
Becerra, 16-1146 Issues: (1) Whether a determination that a law is content-based leaves room for a court to apply something less than strict scrutiny, specifically (a) whether the court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm
Handelman v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:59 am
” Arizona v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am
Alabama, 16-9282 Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am
On Wednesday 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment in the case of Littlewoods Ltd & Ors v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
Alabama, 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
