Search for: "Hewlett v. Hewlett-Packard"
Results 381 - 400
of 507
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2010, 2:35 am
This interpretation of Section 251 falls in-line with MPEP § 1402 and with the dicta of Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:01 pm
In that case, Donatelli - a Vice President of EMC's Storage Division - took a job with Hewlett Packard in California and filed an action on his own in California court seeking to enjoin enforcement of his non-compete. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:57 am
When Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) filed its preliminary proxy on Tuesday, we were immediately surprised by one of the numbers in the footnotes to the summary compensation table: the $96 spent by CFO Catherine Lesjak on personal use of the corporate jet. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:18 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron LLC - Federal Circuit says ‘declaratory judgment jurisdiction’ even if patent holder’s notice avoids phrases like ‘infringement’ and ‘assertion’ (Patents4Life) Except as provided elsewhere, or trumped, I’ll own all the IP – Delaware Chancery Court reminds of risks of wholesale incorporation by reference between separate IP agreements and judicial misreading of patent law: Cepahlon… [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:14 am
The recent CAFC decision in Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron (http://www.patentlyo.com/09-1283.pdf) provides a good reminder that sending an invitation to license or discuss licensing of a patent to a potential target might be enough post-MedImmune to justify declaratory judgment (DJ) jurisdiction when the target wishes to challenge the patent-in-interest in district court. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:14 am
The recent CAFC decision in Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron (http://www.patentlyo.com/09-1283.pdf) provides a good reminder that sending an invitation to license or discuss licensing of a patent to a potential target might be enough post-MedImmune to justify declaratory judgment (DJ) jurisdiction when the target wishes to challenge the patent-in-interest in district court. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:30 am
A U.S. government security panel rejected the deal, however. 3Com is now in the process of being purchased by Hewlett-Packard Co. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
to pay 23% ongoing royalty for future infringement: Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:47 am
" Based on this decision, it appears very difficult for a NPE to even contact a potential licensee without exposing itself to the potential for a declaratory judgment action.More detail of Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:35 am
In the new case, Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron LLC, Acceleron sent a letter to HP identifying an Acceleron patent and inviting HP to meet with Acceleron to discuss licensing – but only if HP would agree in writing that no case or controversy existed regarding the patent. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:05 am
Carr v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:05 pm
Illinois Appellate Court Holds Motion to Compel Arbitration of Individual Claims in Class Action Complaint Alleging Violations of Various Consumer Protection Laws, based on Arbitration Clause Containing Class Action Waiver, Properly Denied because Agreement Required Disputes be Heard by National Arbitration Forum which no Longer Conducted Consumer Arbitrations Plaintiffs filed a putative class action in Illinois state court against Gateway, Intel, Hewlett-Packard and others… [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Hewlett-Packard Company v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:01 pm
It was a good Friday for Fenwick & West’s Charlene Morrow, who got client Hewlett-Packard out of a jam and caused the Federal Circuit â€" the high court of patent case appeals â€" to move the needle a little toward companies who want to squash patent trolls before they get started. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:33 pm
Last week, the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s dismissal of a declaratory judgment complaint against a patent holding company in Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Hewlett-Packard v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Hewlett-Packard v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
Hewlett-Packard v. [read post]
